Wake Forest Law Review

Sponsored by:

The Wake Forest Eudaimonia Institute & The Wake Forest Provost’s Fund for Academic Excellence

Friday, January 31, 2020

8:45 a.m. to 3:45 p.m.

Wake Forest University School of Law, Room 1312


CLE Credits: Provided Pending Approval

This event is free and open to the public.

Live Stream

Check back here for links to the live stream.


A campus parking map can be found here. Reserved parking will be available for registered symposium attendees near the Wake Forest School of Law. Please check back before the event for specific parking instructions. Signs will be posted at the approved parking lots to guide visitors to the event.

Event Description

The Wake Forest Law Review is hosting its annual Spring Symposium on January 31, 2020 regarding pretrial detention and bail reform at the Wake Forest University School of Law. This topic is scheduled to elicit leading scholars on the subject from around the country as well as other important stakeholders in North Carolina and elsewhere.  The Symposium is set to shed light on the large, yet often unaddressed problem of pre-trial detention in the United States.

The scope of pretrial detention in America is significant: More than half a million people sit in jail at any given time in America because they have been merely accused of a crime.  Such broad pretrial detention deprives people of their liberty before being afforded significant process, undermines the presumption of innocence, increases crime, and wastes tax dollars by locking up a lot of people who are not dangerous. Direct cost estimates for our current state of widespread pretrial detention range between nine and twelve billion dollars per year.  And those numbers do not account for the loss of human flourishing that pretrial detention inflicts, including loss of employment and housing as well as defendants’ lost contributions to economic growth or to tax bases.  For defendants who are the primary wage earners in their family, widespread use of pretrial detention leaves families to fend for themselves and depend more heavily on public assistance.  Moreover, recent empirical evidence demonstrates that defendants detained pretrial are more likely to be convicted than those released pretrial and are likely to serve longer postconviction sentences.

The symposium will bring together criminal law stakeholders, academics, and community groups to discuss the current state of bail reform and how to continue reforming these systems.  With each panel our aim is to combine theory with an understanding of facts on the ground regarding various aspects of pretrial detention and from various places across the country.  We hope that you will be able to join us for this event.  A light breakfast will be provided, and CLE credit is available.  

By: Mike Garrigan

“It is always an exciting time to be a part of Wake Forest Law Review, but it’s not every year you get to make history,” commented incoming Editor-in-Chief Holly Ingram. For the first time in over two decades, and for the third time in Law Review’s sixty-five-year history, the top leadership on the Wake Forest Law Review is a female duo. The Editor-in-Chief (EIC) and Managing Editor (ME) serve as the journal’s “president” and “secretary,” respectively. Incoming Managing Editor Hanna Monson commented, “I am incredibly honored and excited to be working with Holly this year and think it’s quite special to have two women in leadership of the Law Review. We are both very excited about our new roles and the opportunity to represent the Law Review and Wake Forest in this way. I feel like we will make a great team.”

The last time a female EIC/ME combination led the journal was in 1994 and the only other time before that was 1991. Moreover, the 2018-19 Wake Forest Law Review masthead reflects an executive editing suite comprised of mostly women, with women serving in all senior editing positions.

Wake Law Visiting Professor Meghan Boone commented, “Having a broad array of perspectives and backgrounds in leadership positions is critical to ensuring our institutions are reflective of the communities they draw from. Despite the fact that women have made up half – or more than half – of law students for a long time, their representation in the leadership structures of student law journals has lagged behind. Their strong representation on the editorial board of the Wake Law Review for the coming year is a positive step in ensuring that the Law Review is reflective of the diverse group of students here at Wake Forest University School of Law.”

Wake Law Dean Suzanne Reynolds observed, “How proud I am to be a part of a law school that continues to recognize the importance of diversity. Having women at the table – in boardrooms, legislatures, judicial benches, and law journals – makes a difference.”