Wake Forest Law Review

27Oct

Enhancing the Role of Public Interest Organizations in Rulemaking via Pre-Notice Transparency

Categories: Law Review
Comments Off on Enhancing the Role of Public Interest Organizations in Rulemaking via Pre-Notice Transparency

By: Richard Murphy* In 1983, then-Administrator William Ruckelshaus promised that under his leadership, EPA would operate “in a fishbowl.” I wish to reaffirm this commitment and take the opportunity to provide guidelines about how we will ensure transparency in our interactions with all members of the public. Lisa Jackson, EPA Administrator[1] Introduction The basic template […]

Read more
Tags:
6Sep

Think Small: The Future of Public Financing After Arizona Free Enterprise

Categories: Law Review
Comments Off on Think Small: The Future of Public Financing After Arizona Free Enterprise

By: Glen Hudson* “It is money! . . .  Money!  Money!  Not ideas, nor principles, but money that reigns supreme in American politics.”[1] Campaign spending in the 2010 midterm election cycle hit record levels following a string of United States Supreme Court rulings on campaign finance,[2] includingCitizens United v. FEC[3] and Davis v. FEC.[4]  Candidates, political parties, and […]

Read more
Tags:
6Sep

It’s Time To Try Something New: Why Old Precedent Does Not Suit Charter Schools in the Search for State Actor Status

Categories: Law Review
Comments Off on It’s Time To Try Something New: Why Old Precedent Does Not Suit Charter Schools in the Search for State Actor Status

By: Catherine LoTempio* Introduction Today, education reform continues to be at the forefront of issues important to the American public.  Although education reform has taken various forms over the years, one of the more noteworthy developments has been the creation of charter schools through state legislation.[1]  Charter schools emerged in 1991 when Minnesota enacted the […]

Read more
Tags:
6Sep

Community Prosecution, Comparative Prosecution

Categories: Law Review
Comments Off on Community Prosecution, Comparative Prosecution

By: Ronald F. Wright* Criminal prosecutors, like other public servants in a representative democracy, must continually work out what it means to “represent” the public.[1] One prosecutor might view the job as one for an expert, bringing technical skills and judgment to questions of public safety. Another prosecutor might aim for a more responsive relationship, […]

Read more
Tags:
5Sep

The Normative Case for Normative Grand Juries

Categories: Law Review
Comments Off on The Normative Case for Normative Grand Juries

By: Josh Bowers* Introduction There is a broad swath of cases—perhaps the majority in many jurisdictions—where arrests are based on the allegations and observations of no witnesses except the arresting officers; where there are no concrete victims; where cases are typically resolved with some form of guilty plea at the first appearance or shortly thereafter; […]

Read more
Tags:
5Sep

Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: The Shared Aims and Occasional Conflicts of Legitimacy and Moral Credibility

Categories: Law Review
Comments Off on Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: The Shared Aims and Occasional Conflicts of Legitimacy and Moral Credibility

By: Josh Bowers* & Paul H. Robinson** Introduction A growing literature suggests that a criminal justice system derives practical value by generating societal perceptions of fair enforcement and adjudication.[1]  Specifically, perceptions of procedural fairness—resulting in perceptions of the system’s “legitimacy,” as the term is used—may promote systemic compliance with substantive law, cooperation with legal institutions […]

Read more
Tags:
5Sep

The Community Prosecutor: Questions of Professional Discretion

Categories: Law Review
Comments Off on The Community Prosecutor: Questions of Professional Discretion

By: Bruce A. Green* & Alafair S. Burke** This Article examines community prosecuting from an ethics perspective.  Our focus is not on prosecutors’ compliance with the disciplinary rules, however.  The strategies that have been said to exemplify community prosecuting are almost invariably compliant with disciplinary rules and other aspects of the law governing prosecutors.  Rather, […]

Read more
Tags:
5Sep

Community-Based Prosecution in North Carolina: An Inside-Out Approach to Public Service at the Courthouse, on the Street, and in the Classroom

Categories: Law Review
Comments Off on Community-Based Prosecution in North Carolina: An Inside-Out Approach to Public Service at the Courthouse, on the Street, and in the Classroom

By: Ben David* Introduction I am a North Carolina prosecutor.[1]  I speak for the dead in murder trials and dismiss registration violations in traffic court.  I advise police officers in station houses and listen to cooperating criminals in holding cells.  When a crime affects us all, I am the conscience for the community, and I […]

Read more
Tags:
14Apr

Regulating Companies as if the World Matters: Reflections From the Ongoing Sustainable Companies Project

Categories: Law Review
Comments Off on Regulating Companies as if the World Matters: Reflections From the Ongoing Sustainable Companies Project

By: Beate Sjåfjell* Introduction: A Moral Imperative for Action The company is one of the most ingenious inventions of our time.[1]  With limited liability for its investors, enabling capital to be (in theory) put to its most efficient use, the company has become the backbone of our economies.  But must this all-important component of our market […]

Read more
Tags:
11Apr

A Signaling Theory of Lockups in Mergers

Categories: Law Review
Comments Off on A Signaling Theory of Lockups in Mergers

By: Shmuel Leshem* Empirical evidence shows that termination fees (“lockups”) in merger agreements of public companies discourage competition for the target company but do not necessarily harm target shareholders.  This Article presents a signaling theory consistent with this evidence and considers the theory’s normative implications.  The chief argument is that the presence of a lockup […]

Read more
Tags:
11Apr

When Staying Discovery Stays Justice: Analyzing Motions to Stay Discovery When a Motion to Dismiss is Pending

Categories: Law Review
Comments Off on When Staying Discovery Stays Justice: Analyzing Motions to Stay Discovery When a Motion to Dismiss is Pending

By: Kevin J. Lynch* Introduction Discovery plays a key role in our modern federal courts.  Discovery can be costly and burdensome, but it also enables settlement, reduces informational disparities between parties, and clarifies issues for trial.  Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, discovery is intended to occur with limited intervention by the court, absent […]

Read more
Tags:
« Older posts
Newer posts »
« Older posts
Newer posts »