By: David G. Epstein Under the leadership of Dean Blake Morant,[1] the Wake Forest Law Review (the “Law Review”) presented a symposium: Contracts in Context: Identity, Power and Contractual Justice.  Robert Samuel, the Executive Forum Editor of the Law Review, has asked me to write a short scholarly[2] response[3] to one of the papers presented […]

By: Scott J. Burnham A society could enforce all promises.  I recall a student from a South Pacific island who said that was the way of her society.  She was appalled by my casual references to dirty promise breakers, convinced that they really were the scum of the earth.[1] On the other hand, a society […]

By: Andrew R. Klein I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Wake Forest Law Review’s recent tort law symposium.  The Law Review brought together an all-star cast of scholars who produced “must read” articles for those interested in the field. My primary concern is that excessive fragmentation of the Restatement of Torts—particularly in stable […]

By: Richard L. Cupp, Jr. The Restatement (Third) of Torts is innovative in its approach to negligence liability for land possessors in cases involving intentional trespassers, and that is a good thing.  Excessive creativity in a Restatement formulation would not be helpful.  If a dominant jurisdictional position on an issue exists and it makes sense, […]

By: Timothy Davis Responding to Am. Needle, Inc. v. NFL, 130 S. Ct. 2201 (2010). Recognizing these economic realities, the Court nevertheless wisely concluded that the need for NFL teams to cooperate in order to survive economically in producing the sport of football should not shield their conduct from antitrust scrutiny. I. The Intersection of […]

The pdf of the article may be accessed here. By: Robert Chesney Responding to Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 S. Ct. 2705 (2009). Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project may prove to be simply the beginning of a rich vein of emerging jurisprudence at the intersection of national security and civil liberties. Indeed, the majority’s determination […]

By: Michael L. Wells Introduction In his contribution to Wake Forest Law School’s 2009 Symposium on the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Professor Kenneth Abraham starts with two propositions, one descriptive, the other normative.  The descriptive claim is that “tort law . . . is mature and largely stable,”[1] and  that “[o]ver time, the law of different states will converge.”[2] […]

By: Vincent R. Johnson Introduction: Broad Territory When I talk to foreign audiences, I often emphasize the fact that in the United States, unlike in many other countries,[1] tort law is a large and dynamic field.  However, despite my pressing that point, listeners may fail to appreciate the broad scope and importance of this area […]